1-Complete and organized submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions. 2-High quality submissions that clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials.

I posted a model of 15 files, read to answer the question, it’s a case study again it’s a case study .

all assignment info in the assignment file uploaded with the question and files .

It has to be :

1-Complete and organized submissions that adhere to all assignment instructions. 

2-High quality submissions that clearly demonstrate understanding of course materials. 

3-Properly formatted submissions demonstrating professional, college- level tone, no spelling or grammar errors and well- documented sources (when applicable). 

Q. 1  List seven core competencies of Mountain Hazelnuts? Which are the ones that are sustainable in the long-run?: Mountain Hazelnuts: Case Study (40 points). 

1.  Case study 1:  Mountain Hazelnuts: Social Entrepreneurship in Bhutan. 

2.  1        List seven core competencies of Mountain Hazelnuts? Which are the ones that are sustainable in the long-run? (40 points).

Using the rubric, in the content, you will list seven core competencies of Mountain Hazelnuts. Note the ones that are sustainable in the long-run.

In application, you will discuss these rationales in your words. Which are sustainable ones (70 words each core, minimum ).  

 Example : When you asked to list seven core competencies, please do not just write one word and leave it blank.
For example,
1. Employee.
Graders will not give you grade because what doe this mean? They are do not see “employees” as an answer, and they will not be able to figure out what you are trying to say unless you write it.
I suggest that you take some time to explain what you mean by the employee.

I would write this as: Labor: the company brings in workers or labor force that is cheaper. The company has developed relationships and training and management practices that all it to utilize this low-cost labor.

I hope this helps!

focus on content don’t just throw words . read grading criteria